Alina Sorescu and Alexandru Ciucu officially divorced on January 27, after three years. The announcement was made by the artist on social networks.
Alina Sorescu and Alexandru Ciucu officially divorced after three years of archive photo processes
Following the divorce, the artist revealed the reasons that pushed her to make this decision, but also what went through all this time.
“In the 12 years of marriage, I lived in humility, emotional blackmail, contempt for my career, fear and threats, even in the presence of little girls. I initiated the divorce process, from the need for me to live in peace, not having to live. Variant than the court.said Alina Sorescu, quoted by Click! .ro.
“Threatened with divorce”
The artist accused her ex-husband of taking advantage of her notoriety to become known and that, in the years of marriage, she was often absent.
“In the years of marriage, he always found all kinds of reasons to leave with friends: Golf, Kite, Ski, various courses without any purpose (acting, perfumery, made jewelry, boat permit and more) and any other pretext of starting from Country.added it.
She also said that she had to justify the behavior of her ex -husband, because they were still a family, but now she is free to speak openly.
“He threatened me with a divorce for years in a row, he said often that he was posting on Facebook that we are no longer a couple and because he could not kick me out of the house with 2 children, he decided to go to Paris, where he lived for half a year. He left from the country in order to make me leave the house and then pose into the victim, to show that he did not introduce the divorce “she wrote.
Fight for custody
The artist claims that he has requested a common custody, a father’s visit program on weekends and holidays, as is used to such divorce and 1/3 maintenance pension, in accordance with the rights provided by law. .
Later, however, during the trial, her ex -husband gave up the request to get the girls’ domicile and asked for the little girls to live for 1 week, 1 week at the father, which meant “the domicile would be at one of the parents only on paper in theory. ”
At the same time, the father wanted to bear expenses only for the period spent by girls, and later, in order to establish the maintenance pension, he declared his monthly revenues of 807 lei, although he has companies and has employees.
“The first instance from Buftea accepted this 1 week program with 1 week, motivating hallucinating that I work, and the father has free time and can stay with the little girls. Showing the status of the little girls during the program established by the substantive court, the Bucharest Court of Appeal. He suspended the decision and returned to a previously established program by a presidential ordinance with 2 weekends per month and 2 days during the week and divided holidays, as it is generally granted, until the divorce process is finalized.
The final decision of the Ilfov Tribunal has established that the little girls have their domicile to the mother, the exercise of parental authority to be in common, and with the father will spend 1 week during school and 2 weekends per month. Holidays and birthdays are divided ”the artist wrote.
The big girl was heard
During the trial, Carolina, the big girl, turned 10 and could be heard by judges.
“However, the court did not take into account what she wanted: that they should not be in the father during school days, that they no longer want to be walking like two suitcases and they want continuity during the school program. Unfortunately the court does not He also took into account the attachment of the little girls to the maternal grandparents, their habits and the fact that the father was not involved in their life before the start of the process. “accused Alina Sorescu.
