A Hill Capitol hearing brought back the Mystery of UFOs in the fore
The physicist identified four types of shutterstock photo aliens
In a recent briefing on unidentified air phenomena (UAP), physicist Dr. Eric Davis, known for his activity in secret projects, shocked listeners mentioning alleged species-ash (Grays), Nordics (Nordics), insectoids (insectoids) and reptilia (as possible Unidentified, the Daily Mail reveals.
Davis described these entities as humanoids, of dimensions close to those of people, and possibly related to classified programs of reverse engineering.
The discussion was triggered by the Congressman from Missouri Eric Burlison, a member of the Supervisory Committee of the Chamber and the UAP group, which revealed, at the Podcast The Endless Void with Kristin Fisher, that he heard the same four private information.
“I heard these four classifications discussed in the meetings of this office, by others”Burlison said. “But I didn’t expect to hear them from him. I didn’t expect Eric Davis, you know a respected scientist, to say that.”
Burlison, who declares himself skeptically, acknowledged that he did not know for sure what Davis’s sources are, stressing that his statements could come from direct knowledge or second -hand accounts.
“If it is true, it would be a moment that changes the paradigm”, he said. “But if it is true, the Government has no right to keep such a secret to the public it serves.”
The four types of aliens
The concept of ashes as a popular alien archetype has taken shape in the 1960s, largely due to the famous abduction case of Betty and Barney Hill. The couple described the kidnappers as small humanoids, with smooth gray skin, big almond -shaped eyes and without ordinary human traits such as nose or ears.
The Nordics are described as high and supple beings, similar to Scandinavian people, blond hair, blue eyes and light skin. Often associated with the Pleiade star royal, they are presented as holding advanced technology and peaceful intentions, frequently appearing in contacts and UFO folklore in the 1950s.
Insectoids appear in extraterrestrial mythology from the first decades of the 20th century, with origins that can be watched to the film “A journey on the Moon” (1902) of Georges Méliès. These beings have insect features, such as several limbs, exoschelet, mandible and sometimes antennas.
The theory of reptilians – according to which metamorphose aliens with reptile features secretly control the Earth – became popular at the end of the 20th century through David Icke’s conspiracy theories. Interestingly, similar figures, half-man-half snake, also appear in the ancient mythology of South and Southeast Asia, such as Nāga.
Although Davis named them all in May, Burlison tilted to a more earthly explanation, suggesting that the UAPs are most likely advanced human technologies-perhaps experimental projects of private contractors.
“Given all the progress I made-the fact that I discovered the Higgs Boson particle, all the discoveries in quantum physics-and no one has managed to create a form of advanced propulsion …”he noted.
However, Burlison joked that he would be angry if such a technology had existed, remembering how he was blocked on the runway of an airport for three hours due to the weather: “If we have advanced propulsion, I will be very upset.”
Hearings, cataloged as absurd as
The critics rejected the hearings as absurd, with references to reptilians and insectoids that seem to be science-fiction rather than a serious investigation. “Some will think we are crazy”he acknowledged Burlison, aware of the skepticism aroused by his comments.
However, he defended the investigation, emphasizing that the taxpayers’ money funds programs of the Pentagon, Information Services and the Energy Department for UAP study. “I owe American citizens to find out the truth”he said.
Burlison believes that the public could cope with the truth if the existence of aliens were confirmed. “Most would read the title and see their job.”he predicted, observing the tendency of people to normalize even the most extraordinary revelations.
However, he insisted that such discoveries should not be hidden: “The government belongs to the people, not the other way around. Hiding such monumental secrets would mean betraying the public trust.”
Although it remains cautious about the statements about aliens, Burlison intends to press Dr. Davis to clarify whether his surprising remarks come from direct knowledge or secondary reports.
The lack of concrete evidence, together with the ambiguity of Davis’s sources, maintains the debate at the speculative level. Burlison plans to return with questions, to find out if his statements are based on direct observation or analyzes of reported phenomena.