A student from Olt is in a complicated situation that could bring him the significant decrease of the mathematics note. He found out at the end of the test that the additional sheet he asked for is not scanned and will not be corrected.
The student’s problem appeared at the photo math sample. I have
The student, who at the simulations of the national evaluation exam had very good grades in mathematics, wanted his maximum note, considering that it is his “sample”. Everything went smoothly until the end of the sample, when the student asked for additional sheets, exhausting the space reserved on the typical form. However, they would have received simple, stamped sheets, which represent bridges and which are not integrated to the work and scanned. He found this only when the work was scanned and he was told that what he solved on the stamped sheet cannot be scanned and integrated into the work, because it is a mere sketch. It would happen the same, says the student’s mother, and another student who supported the sample in the same classroom. However, his luck was that he wanted to teach the work before the expiration of the time reserved, so that, being warned that the sheet for continuing the work is the lined one, asked for such a sheet and transcribed the resolutions. The unlucky student, focused on solving the requirements of the sample, did not notice what was happening and found out later, after the discussions between colleagues began.
What the candidate’s mother says
“The child says he asked for additional sheet. Received a sheet that he considered what he asked for. He resolved his topics on her, and when he taught the work, he was told that he was a sketch. He told the supervisors that he had asked for additional sheet. And the Lord motivated that – no, you only asked for sheet“, The student’s mother told, for” Truth “.
The student who remained with certain requirements solved only on the sketch would also have been alone in the examination room when teaching the work, an aspect that contravenes the regulation, at the end of the test being compulsory to remain at least three students.
The student of the student, who in the meantime filed notifications to the Olt County School Inspectorate and later at the examination center (the representatives of the examination center initially refused to register his referral) claims that the situation could have been resolved yesterday, even in the examination room, but that he did not want.
“According to the methodology, there is article 9, paragraph 3, which provides in certain situations additional time for retranscripts. Until one hour. Which could be applied then, only that it has not been done. scanned ”, said the father.
The student’s mother says that as soon as she learned of what happened she decided to file a referral to school. However, it was not received. He later went to the Olt County School Inspectorate, made a complaint there, and then returned to school, at the exam center. “Then, the director, seeing me with the notification from the Inspectorate, I had a copy, he allowed me to submit to the notification ”, a declared the mother.
On the so-called sketch the student had solved “At least three topics”his mother said.
“The child is demoralized. Because he fired a lot in mathematics, he considered to be his matter and fired for the maximum note”, the mother added.
He was so marked by what happened that the student did not find resources to check, on Wednesday, on the day of the test, the scale displayed and to calculate how much it could be noted for the resolutions made on the typical form.
An answer, “probably in 5 days”
Solving the situation is difficult at this point, the mother is aware. Moreover, from Ișj Olt I would have been transmitted that he could receive an answer “probably in 5 days”.
“The worse part is that the same thing that happened to my child happened in the same class and another child. Only he taught the work much earlier, the Commission returned and put it to rewrite. The exam time did not end. My son did not notice, because he was focused on finishing what he had to solve. He was not attentive to the discussions. He found out (n. Red. – that the test sheet is different from the one for the work continued) only when he went with his work. From the other colleague he learned from his colleagues and parents ”, Mom said.
The mother confesses that she was in the way to respond to the requests to speak publicly about what happened, because she is afraid that the child will not suffer even more. The child would have already been blamed for not making the difference between the sheet for continuing the work and the one used for tests, but the mother says that in simulations she did not need additional sheets, so there was no situation to ask and see what kind of sheet is given.
Checks to clarify what happened
At the Olt County School Inspectorate, a verification was started, given the aspects notified by the parent. “There is a complaint, indeed, sent to the School Inspectorate, yesterday (n.red. – Wednesday, June 25). It is being resolved, the County Evaluation Commission (n. Red. – The National Evaluation Exam) of this, and of the checks and the arrangement of the measures, in case I have to confirm. Through the county commission, the procedure is respected in such cases. said the general school inspector of IȘJ Olt, Adrian Bărbulete, for the truth.
