Tudor Chirilă, outraged by the CCR’s decision and sharp message for magistrates: “It’s so hard to accept that you have to work like everyone else”

The artist Tudor Chirilă reacted on Facebook after Monday’s decision of the CCR on the reform of the magistrates’ special pensions, declared unconstitutional.

Artist Tudor Chirilă PHOTO: Facebook

The judges of the Constitutional Court decided, on Monday, that the law that was supposed to change the special pensions of magistrates is unconstitutional. Concretely, after postponing the decision twice, today they announced that the reform of magistrates’ pensions violates the fundamental rules of the state.

The decision outraged the artist Tudor Chirilă, who in a post on Facebook makes “dust” both the CCR members and the magistrates who hold on to privileges.

“The CCR has found a “solution” to prolong the moral agony in which it finds itself vis-a-vis its own privileges. They rejected the changes made to the magistrates’ pensions, whose privileges are unique in Europe. Europe that demands the correction of these aberrations, on which it conditions money for Romania through the PNRR. And yet it would be unfair to say that all the judges opposed it, it was not unanimity.

Yes, I also have some questions: what stopped the CCR judges from judging the substance of the problem? And that’s why they postponed the decision for a month to throw us in the face that there is no CSM opinion or I don’t know what else? A month ago they didn’t know that the submission form was not correct? He could have rejected it then. Or to understand that it was not a priority for them? And now what’s next? When the law will return in the right form will the substantive analysis begin? Or the substantive analysis has already been done and will be communicated after the law is sent in the correct form?

When we went out into the streets to defend justice from the messes of Dragnea and Grindeanu who together with PNL protected their corrupt were we good? When we called for the independence of the judiciary and demanded that it fight against corruption, we did not understand that the judiciary and magistrates are above other citizens.

Is it so hard to understand that it’s not normal for someone to take you for granted? Do you forget that Romania spends more than it produces and that unpunished corruption and unrecovered damages are part of this unfavorably tilted balance?

Is it so hard to accept that you have to work like everyone else and be paid reasonably extra, not like a privileged caste?

Do you have any idea how much those state or private doctors work so that you can get into their offices and on their operating tables? How about handing your bodies over to the inexperienced because they retired at 48? And how about paying them a pension equal to their last salary?

What did the magistrates in Romania do to make the overloaded, non-digitalized, bureaucratic justice system work? What did the fair magistrates do against people like Lia Savonea, this soapbox in which the soap of the corrupt is pooled, whom they zealously wash? Where were the Associations of Magistrates when the justice system or criminal procedure codes were violated in any way?

You tell us not to think that we don’t know or understand the legal nuances and issues of your profession.

Well, we also tell you that regardless of the situation you have to work like everyone else. And you’ll have to get used to the idea.

P.S. You should be ashamed of yourself for coming up with the idea of ​​telling our kids to be a judge mother that you study a lot but work a little and you’re going to get more money than all those suckers who are going to shoot until they’re 65. Be the judge, mother, that life is short and worth living.” writes Chirilă on Facebook.