The famous policeman Marian Godina makes a discordant note with the wave of reactions that criticize the CCR decision on Thursday – by which the statements of wealth will no longer be public – and believes that most have revolted, thinking of dignitaries, not all civil servants.
Marian Godina says it does not seem normal for the statement of wealth to be public. Facebook photo
The policeman-influencer describes his own situation before asking his pursuits if they would agree to make public “The income, the accounts, the car, the house, the salary of the spouse”.
“I start by saying that, unlike most of those who are now revolted by the decision, I count myself among the people who have the obligation to submit a declaration of wealth annually, because I am a policeman, that is, a civil servant with special status. In the first years as a policeman, the completion of the declaration of wealth seemed to me something, I had nothing to do, I had no one, I had nothing, Credits. Then, I made a loan of personal needs, for 10 years.”.
“Why do you think this is normal? It doesn’t seem to me”
Marian Godina specifies that the text posted is just his personal opinion.
“In one year, I think in 2017, I am afraid not to make the year wrong, my parents decided to donate my parent’s house. Do you find this act. «Who donated to Godina a house in Brasov?». I am convinced that at this time there are people who have read then and have remained with the impression that someone gave me a house against some services. In another year, I went to Antena 1 to IUMOR, for a fee, normal, because I was on my work. This also appeared in the declaration of wealth, public, with the exact amount received. Why do you think this is normal? I am not pairedRe, ”says Marian Godina
Why do anyone in this world have to see how much money I have in your account
The famous policeman also tells that last year he made a mortgage loan “Which will appear again publicly“:
“Isn’t this an intimate thing? Maybe I didn’t want someone to know this. I don’t want to see colleagues, nations, neighbors that I have a loan, how many years, which apartment I bought and how many have. As with the car. I have to write every year what car I have, what mark, what? I have to complete. «How, me, I saw that you have»?
What fault does my wife have that I am a civil servant?
Marian Godina states that he agrees to complete the declaration of wealth and to submit it to years, but that it does not seem natural for the information in the document to be accessible to everyone.
“Aaa, do not understand the wrong, I agree with the completion of the declaration of wealth and sending it to the years, and those from ANI will flee me as much as they want, and if they discover the irregularities to support the rigors of the law, but it does not seem normal for these data to be public. More and more aberrant, we have to go where they work, Work to see that she has a higher or lower salary. he argues.
It would agree to make your income, accounts, car, house, spouse’s salary, etc.
The policeman-influencer gave his followers and a topic of thought:
“I know that most have revolted thinking of dignitaries, not all civil servants, but maybe you should look at the situation more objective. And, above all, ask yourself if you would agree to make your income, accounts, car, house, spouse’s salary, etc. And if you say «Well, if I have nothing to hide, why not publish» I’ll ask you if you would agree to listen to your phones. That you just don’t have something to hide.
PS If anyone believes that that statement of wealth made some of refrain from stealing, I remind them of the one who was his own mother. “
We remind that on Thursday, May 29, the Constitutional Court of Romania decided that the legal provisions according to which the declarations of wealth must also contain the goods and revenues of the spouses, thus admitting a notification regarding two articles of Law no.176/2010 on the integrity in the exercise of public functions and dignities.
The decision that allows to hide the assets of the spouses and children was made unanimously by the RCC, while the decision related to the prohibition of the publication of these statements was adopted by a majority of votes.
Among those who criticized the RCC decision are the President of Romania, Nicușor Dan.
